BERT vs GPT: What's the Difference?
BERT and GPT are both transformer models, but they work very differently. Learn which architecture fits your use case.

BERT vs GPT: What's the Difference?
If you have followed AI news over the past few years, you have heard both names constantly: BERT from Google and GPT from OpenAI. Both are based on the transformer architecture. Both revolutionized natural language processing. But they work in fundamentally different ways.
Understanding the difference between BERT and GPT is essential for choosing the right tool for your AI application.
The Short Answer
Aspect | BERT | GPT |
|---|---|---|
Architecture | Encoder-only | Decoder-only |
Direction | Bidirectional (sees all text at once) | Unidirectional (left-to-right) |
Training task | Masked language modeling | Next token prediction |
Best for | Understanding text | Generating text |
Example use | Search, classification, Q&A extraction | Chatbots, writing, code generation |
The Transformer: Their Common Ancestor
Both BERT and GPT come from the same source: the 2017 paper "Attention Is All You Need," which introduced the transformer architecture.
The original transformer had two main parts:
- Encoder: Processes the input and creates a rich representation of it
- Decoder: Takes that representation and generates output
Think of it like translation:
- The encoder reads and understands the French sentence
- The decoder writes the English translation
BERT uses only the encoder part. GPT uses only the decoder part.
This fundamental choice shapes everything about how they work.
How BERT Works
Bidirectional Understanding
BERT stands for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers.
The key word is "bidirectional." When BERT processes text, every word can attend to every other word, including words that come after it.
For the sentence "The bank by the river was closed":
- When processing "bank," BERT sees both "The" (before) and "river" (after)
- This helps it understand that "bank" means riverbank, not a financial institution
Masked Language Modeling
BERT was trained using a task called masked language modeling (MLM).
During training:
- Take a sentence: "The cat sat on the mat"
- Mask some words: "The [MASK] sat on the [MASK]"
- Ask the model to predict the masked words
This forces BERT to understand context from both directions to make accurate predictions.
Example: How BERT Processes Text
Input: "The movie was absolutely [MASK]"
BERT sees the entire sentence at once and predicts what word fits in the mask. It might predict "amazing," "terrible," or "boring" depending on what it learned from training data.
But notice: BERT is filling in a blank, not continuing the sentence.
What BERT Is Good At
Task | Why BERT Works Well |
|---|---|
Text classification | Understands the whole document before classifying |
Named entity recognition | Sees context on both sides of each entity |
Question answering (extractive) | Finds answers within provided text |
Semantic similarity | Compares meaning of two texts |
Search ranking | Understands query intent and document relevance |
BERT Variants
The BERT family has expanded significantly:
Model | Improvement |
|---|---|
RoBERTa | Better training procedure |
ALBERT | Smaller, more efficient |
DistilBERT | Compressed for speed |
DeBERTa | Improved attention mechanism |
ELECTRA | More efficient training objective |
How GPT Works
Unidirectional Generation
GPT stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer.
Unlike BERT, GPT processes text in one direction: left to right. When predicting a word, it can only see the words that came before it, never after.
For the sentence "The bank by the river was closed":
- When processing "bank," GPT only sees "The"
- It doesn't know "river" is coming, so it might initially think of a financial bank
Next Token Prediction
GPT was trained on a simpler task: predict the next token.
During training:
- Take text: "The cat sat on the"
- Predict what comes next: "mat" (or "floor," "couch," etc.)
- Move forward and repeat for every position
This trains the model to generate coherent text that continues naturally from any starting point.
Example: How GPT Processes Text
Input: "The movie was absolutely"
GPT predicts the next word based only on what it has seen so far. It might output "amazing" and then continue:
"The movie was absolutely amazing. The acting was..."
Unlike BERT, GPT keeps generating, one token at a time.
What GPT Is Good At
Task | Why GPT Works Well |
|---|---|
Text generation | Designed specifically for this |
Chatbots and conversation | Naturally produces responses |
Code generation | Continues code patterns effectively |
Creative writing | Generates novel content |
Summarization (abstractive) | Produces new text summarizing input |
Translation | Generates text in target language |
GPT Variants
The GPT family has grown dramatically:
Model | Year | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|
GPT-1 | 2018 | Original 117M parameters |
GPT-2 | 2019 | 1.5B parameters, surprisingly capable |
GPT-3 | 2020 | 175B parameters, few-shot learning |
GPT-3.5 | 2022 | ChatGPT's original model |
GPT-4 | 2023 | Multimodal, significantly improved |
GPT-5 | 2025 | Latest generation |
Direct Comparison
Architecture Diagram
BERT (Encoder):
Input: "The cat sat on the mat"
↓
[All tokens processed together]
[Every token attends to every token]
↓
Output: Rich representation of each tokenGPT (Decoder):
Input: "The cat sat"
↓
[Tokens processed left-to-right]
[Each token only sees previous tokens]
↓
Output: "on" (next token prediction)
↓
Continue generating...Training Comparison
Aspect | BERT | GPT |
|---|---|---|
Task | Fill in the blanks | Predict next word |
Sees | Whole sentence at once | Only previous words |
Masks | 15% of tokens randomly | Uses causal mask |
Output | Understanding | Generation |
Parameter Counts (Historical)
Model | Parameters | Release |
|---|---|---|
BERT-base | 110M | 2018 |
BERT-large | 340M | 2018 |
GPT-2 | 1.5B | 2019 |
GPT-3 | 175B | 2020 |
GPT-4 | ~1.7T (estimated) | 2023 |
Note: GPT models have grown much larger because generation at scale benefits more from increased capacity.
When to Use Which
Choose BERT (or encoder models) when:
- You need to understand text, not generate it
- Your task involves classification (sentiment, topic, intent)
- You're building search or retrieval systems
- You need extractive Q&A (finding answers in documents)
- You want to compare text similarity
- You're doing named entity recognition or tagging
Choose GPT (or decoder models) when:
- You need to generate new text
- You're building a chatbot or assistant
- You want creative writing or content generation
- You need code completion or generation
- You're doing translation or summarization
- You want flexible, general-purpose AI
The Middle Ground: Encoder-Decoder Models
Some tasks benefit from both encoding and decoding. Models like T5 and BART use the full encoder-decoder architecture:
- Encoder understands the input
- Decoder generates the output
These work well for translation, summarization, and question answering where you need both comprehension and generation.
Modern Evolution
BERT's Legacy
BERT dominated NLP from 2018 to 2022 for tasks like:
- Google Search ranking
- Enterprise text classification
- Document understanding
Today, BERT-style encoders are still widely used, especially in:
- Embedding models for RAG systems (like sentence-transformers)
- Reranking in search pipelines
- Efficient classification where you don't need generation
GPT's Dominance
Since ChatGPT's release in late 2022, decoder-only models have become dominant for most applications:
- Generation capability is more versatile
- Scale has enabled emergent abilities
- Instruction tuning made them practical for end users
Models like GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and Llama are all decoder-only architectures.
Why Decoders Won
Several factors led to GPT-style models becoming dominant:
- Scaling laws favor decoders: Generation ability improves more consistently with scale
- Flexibility: One model can do many tasks through prompting
- User experience: Chat interfaces are intuitive
- Emergent abilities: Large decoders show reasoning and in-context learning
BERT-style encoders are still valuable, but they have become specialized tools rather than general-purpose AI.
Practical Example: Same Task, Different Approaches
Task: Determine if a movie review is positive or negative.
Review: "This film was a complete waste of time. The acting was wooden and the plot made no sense."
BERT Approach
- Pass the review through BERT
- Take the [CLS] token representation
- Feed it to a classification head
- Output: Negative (95% confidence)
BERT sees the entire review at once and classifies based on overall understanding.
GPT Approach
- Construct a prompt: "Classify this review as positive or negative: 'This film was a complete waste of time. The acting was wooden and the plot made no sense.' Classification:"
- GPT generates: "Negative"
GPT treats classification as a generation task, producing the label as text.
Result: Both work, but BERT is more efficient for pure classification. GPT is more flexible if you also want explanations.
Key Takeaways
Concept | What to Remember |
|---|---|
BERT | Encoder-only, bidirectional, for understanding |
GPT | Decoder-only, left-to-right, for generation |
Training | BERT fills masks, GPT predicts next token |
Strength | BERT for analysis, GPT for creation |
Modern use | BERT in embeddings/search, GPT in chatbots/assistants |
Choose BERT | Classification, similarity, extraction |
Choose GPT | Generation, conversation, flexible tasks |
Both architectures come from the same transformer foundation, but their design choices make them suited for fundamentally different tasks. Understanding this distinction helps you pick the right tool for your AI applications.
Related Reading
- What is the Transformer Architecture?: The foundation both models build on
- What are Embeddings?: How text becomes vectors
- What is Semantic Search?: Where BERT-style models shine


